Saturday, November 30, 2013

KLSE.8k's Idea to achieve Financial Freedom by Stock Market Investment: A Review - Xaivier Chia

29 November 2013
 
KLSE.8K (a.k.a. 8K) is an experienced and famous investor in Malaysia. Based on 8K's insight, having one million assets in our life is achievable. Firstly, we need to understand the power of compounding.
 

The Power of Compounding

If your initial capital is RM10,000.00 and your target is RM1,000,000.00, all you need to do is to find 7 undervalued businesses that provide at least 100% potential profits as follows:
 
0: RM   10,000
1: RM   20,000
2: RM   40,000
3: RM   80,000
4: RM  160,000
5: RM  320,000
6: RM  640,000
7: RM1,280,000
 
Apparently, this target is achievable.
 

Time is Money

However, the problem is - how long should we take to achieve 100% return in one business. This really depends on the ability of your investment as follows: 
 
Return of Investment rate:   5% -> time taken to achieve 100% capital appreciation: 14 years
Return of Investment rate: 10% -> time taken to achieve 100% capital appreciation:  7 years
Return of Investment rate: 15% -> time taken to achieve 100% capital appreciation:  5 years
Return of Investment rate: 20% -> time taken to achieve 100% capital appreciation:  4 years
Return of Investment rate: 25% -> time taken to achieve 100% capital appreciation:  3 years
 
Personally, I think the average return of investment rate of 10~15% is achievable by people who are seriously do their homework.  
 

Capital + Time + Compound

With the return rate of 10%, it will take 7 years to achieve 100% capital appreciation. Then, in order to achieve RM one million from RM10,000, it will take 49 years! It appears that 49 years is a quite long period of time. Well, there are two ways to address this concern:
 

1. To increase the initial capital to RM100,000.

Then it only takes 24.5 years (7 multiply by ~3.5 years) to achieve RM1,000,000.
 
Or

 

2. To start as earlier as possible

If we started with an initial capital of RM10,000 for investment from your 10 years old, then we would have RM one million when we were 59 years old.
 
Or
 

3. To improve the capability of investment

If we improved our capability of investment to the average of 15%, then we would speed-up our return to achieve the target within 35 years.
 

To Control What is Controllable

However, only the amount of capital and the capability of investment are what we can control.

To increase the amount of capital

We need to have a strong Will-power (for more information, please find Green Lantern) plus discipline to save our initial capital.

To increase the ability of investment

We need to constantly and never ending learn and practise investment from time to time.
 
That's all for today. I hope this sharing inspires you to getting started to learn to be smart consumers (to avoid unnecessary spending) and intelligent investors, and eventually, achieve financial freedom. More fascinating articles and sharing will be updated weekly in Xaivier Blog. So, you are welcome to subscribe our feed to receive our latest sharing.
 
Written by: Xaivier Chia

P/S: The above sharing is solely based on personal insight and information that believed to be reliable. Your valuable feedback are very welcome.
http://xaivierchia.blogspot.com/2013/11/klse8ks-idea-to-achieve-financial.html

klse.8k http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/klse8kcollections/blidx.jsp
李财有方 http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/lottenlee/blidx.jsp

Friday, November 29, 2013

受惠GST 世纪软件净利料提升

吉隆坡29日讯)世纪软件(CENSOF,5195,主板科技股)表示,该公司将从政府在2015年4月落实消费税(GST)的举措中受惠,预计公司下一财政年(截至2015年3月31日止)净利将有所增长,而订单合约估计可达到5000万令吉。

世纪软件董事经理拿督山苏胡辛表示,据市场分析显示,公司的新旧客户都面对支付系统提升和更新。

他透露,世纪软件符合政府条件,有望成为金融管理软件解决方案(FMSS)供应商,并且参与政府部门的培训计划。

他称,目前,世纪软件拥有80至100位特定客户,如果每位客户需要20万至30万令吉来更新或提升系统,这将提振世纪软件来年的净利。

他在今天出席世纪软件的股东特别大会後,向媒体如此表示。

陪同出席的包括世纪软件企业服务董事黄锦贤和执行董事泰米尔孝威。

此外,山苏胡辛指出,世纪软件的海外业务,如印尼丶菲律宾等国家,都拥有很好的发展前景。

他称,基於缅甸软件业务刚起步,因此无法估计贡献比重。

另外,该公司透过印尼子公司Praisindo科技获得新的银行客户。

「公司明年较大的海外合约项目是菲律宾政府价值约3亿令吉的政府财务系统(Government Financial System),申请书即将呈交,估计半年後会得知结果。」

他预测,明年海外业务贡献比重将提升至20%。

世纪软件在今天的特大,一致通过总值1亿令吉的可赎回可转换票据(RCN),筹获的资金将作为时光工程的收购用途。

这也是大马第一次使用可赎回可转换票据(RCN)方式完成交易。

据文告指出,该票据的有期限为36个月(截至2016年止),并会在6月30日与12月31日之间支付年利率2%利息。

该公司目前持有时光工程(TIME,,主板科技股)的45.03%股权,而国库控股(Khazanah)不再持有任何股权。

随着收购时光工程股权,该公司从手握2000万令吉净现金,转为负债6600万令吉,或相等于1.7倍负债率。

不过,山苏胡辛披露,该公司计划在3年内回到零负债率。

继时光工程有3名非执行董事辞职,山苏胡辛已受委为该公司的董事兼首席执行员。

山苏胡辛强调,如果全面收购成功,将维持时光工程的上市地位。

世纪软件也在今天发文告指出,将公司财政年结帐日,从原本的2013年12月31日,改为2014年3月31日。

该公司也在今天公布2013财政年第三季(截至9月30日止)业绩,其净利按年下跌36.46%,至113万1000令吉。不过,营业额按年成长43.52%,至764万7000令吉。

至於累积今年首9个月,其净利下挫19.87%,为382万2000令吉;营业额则成长22.13%,至3312万8000令吉。

大马机场竞标海外经营权正面

吉隆坡29日讯)分析员对大马机场(AIRPORT,5014,主板贸服股)竞标麦克坦-宿雾国际机场(Mactan-Cebu International Airport,简称MCIA)项目的消息并不感到意外,而且还持正面看法。

此项消息激励大马机场今天的股价走势,该股以全天最低价位8.64令吉开市,比周四的闭市价8.63令吉,稍微高出1仙。

盘中交易,该股曾触及8.75令吉全天最高价位,起12仙或1.39%;惟,之後回吐大部份涨幅,最後以8.66令吉挂收,起3仙或0.35%。

不过,与昨日相比,该股的交投情绪转淡,全天成交量从昨日的568万1500股,减至66万1500股。

大马机场昨日公布,与第一菲律宾控股(First Philippine Holdings Corporation,简称FPH)签署备忘录(MoU),组成第一菲律宾机场财团,竞标MCIA项目

分析员普遍对大马机场的举动不感意外,并持正面看法。

该长达25年的MCIA特许经营合约价值达13亿令吉,当中包括建筑新客运大楼和扩建工程,还有机场的营运丶维修和管理以及其他有关的工程。若大马机场和FPH所组成的第一菲律宾机场财团成功标得MCIA工程,双方将设立一家联营公司以承接该机场的项目。

由於大马机场一直以来都在寻求海外潜在商机,所以肯纳格研究分析员对于此消息并不意外。

「大马机场目前共投资3家海外机场,而且该公司在今年首季亦尝试竞标伦敦斯坦斯塔德机场的工程。」

丰隆投行分析员亦有同感,除了认为此消息符合大马机场通过国际投资提振和多元化收入来源的长期策略,并对此消息抱持正面看法。

尽管如此,在众多国际机场营运公司参与竞标之下,MCIA的竞投将会相当激烈,成功竞标的名单将在明年1月揭晓。

另外,分析员皆认为,大马机场在融资方面,将不成问题。

肯纳格研究分析员相信,大马机场可在不违反其债务契约下融资。

丰隆投行分析员则预期,大马机场将通过内部资金和贷款来融资该项目。

分析员对大马机场的前景均表示看好,丰隆投行和肯纳格研究分别维持该股「买进」和「与大市同步」评级,目标价格分别为9.25令吉和8.63令吉

强势新元引关注 云顶 云顶大马双双下跌

吉隆坡29日讯)在强势新元的阴霾笼罩下,云顶(GENTING,3182,主板贸服股)和云顶大马(GENM,4715,主板贸服股)非但无法因亮丽的 盈利成长表现而取得股价涨势,周五反而双双走跌,前者大跌14仙或1.4%,报10.22令吉,成为全场第8大下跌股。 至于云顶大马,则下跌4仙或0.9%,报4.24令吉。

云顶和云顶大马的2013财政年第三季(截至9月30日止)净利分别按年暴增65.4%和69.49%,至4亿6209万令吉和3亿2261万令吉。然而,大好的净利成长表现并无法带动两只股项的股价表现,反之两者双双呈跌,且跌幅不小。

市场人士关注到云顶向大马交易所提呈的业绩报告中,表明新元兑区域货币持续走强,导致新加坡成为一个越趋昂贵的旅游地点。

这也料或多或少将冲击云顶在新加坡的赌场表现,因亚洲赌场的许多赌客皆非本地人,尤其是豪赌型的赌客则大多来自中国。

此外,随着越来越多亚洲国家开放让企业设立赌场,或正在考虑解禁赌博行为,区域博彩领域的竞争亦日趋激烈。

除了新加坡,区域赌客尚可选择传统的赌场热门地点如澳门丶以及新近开设赌场的柬埔寨丶菲律宾等。

以令吉为例,自今年5月以来,兑新元汇率一度大跌9%,最低下探1新元兑2.6110令吉。无论如何,10月至今,新元的强劲涨势稍缓,令吉对新元汇率回升0.98%,至1新元兑2.5691令吉。

此外,云顶也表明,该公司与许多新加坡公司一样,面对劳工短缺问题。

此情况相信与该国因国内政治压力而收紧移民法规有关。云顶将通过持续改善生产力效率来应对劳工问题。

针对云顶和云顶大马的业绩表现,分析员普遍认为符合预期,并普遍维持「买进」或「守住」评级。云顶的平均目标价格为11.40令吉,并获得较多分析员给予「买进」评级,而云顶大马的平均目标价格4.40令吉,分析员大多给予「守住」评级。

息税前盈利跌14%

分析员认为,大马的云顶赌场因关闭主题乐园作升级用途,而影响客流量,赌场收入按年面对双位数萎缩,而游乐场业务收入则呈单位数跌幅,其中主题乐园就少了800万令吉营收。

这也造成大马云顶赌场息税前盈利(EBITDA)下跌14%,赚幅则受该公司自7月1日以来落实最低薪金制冲击。

海外业务方面,云顶新加坡取得飙青表现,而英国和美国业务也逐步获得改善。

分析员展望,基于末季是主要节庆季度,云顶和云顶大马料将取得更佳的业绩表现。

Sunday, November 24, 2013

隆市估价上调推高开销 料冲击产托业获利

(吉隆坡24日讯)若吉隆坡市政局(DBKL)落实上调估价建议,或冲击房地产投资信托(REITs)位于市中心房产明年的业绩表现。
 有报导指吉隆坡市政局建议上调房产年度价值,预计估值率介于100%至300%之间。继房市冷却措施,这将成为该领域另一绊脚石。
 财经周刊《The Edge》报导指尝试联络吉隆坡市政局获取详情,但不得其门而入。
 根据一家上市房地产投资信托执行董事透露,该领域在高估价下将导致高营运开销,因而影响净利表现。
 目前住宅房产和商业房产年度税率,分别为6%和12%。业者和房产分析师相信当局无意上调税率,反而是调整征收估价税的房产估值。
 一名分析师指出:“这将影响近期未有更新估值的现有工程,相对新发展工程料不受影响。”
 据悉多数房地产投资信托基金已接获2014年上半年估价报表,并会在明年2月支付税项。

What Are Owner Earnings?

How much profit does a company make? This may seem like a simple question but in reality is chock-full of nuance. There's the net income which shows up on a company's income statement - this is the number that most people focus on. The big problem with net income is that it is by definition an accounting number. Capital expenditures made by a company are depreciated over many years, so a company could be hemorrhaging money with net income largely unaffected. Also, non-cash charges, such as write-offs, are deducted from net income. These don't affect the amount of cash a company generates but reduce the "earnings" none the less.
A better option is looking at the free cash flow. Free cash flow is a measure of the actual cash generated by a company. Free cash flow is convenient to use because it shows up directly on the cash flow statement. But there is actually a better option: Owner Earnings. Warren Buffet, famed value investor and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, defined owner earnings in his 1985 letter to shareholders.
These represent (a) reported earnings plus (b) depreciation, depletion, amortization, and certain other non-cash charges...less (c) the average annual amount of capitalized expenditures for plant and equipment, etc. that the business requires to fully maintain its long-term competitive position and its unit volume....Our owner-earnings equation does not yield the deceptively precise figures provided by GAAP, since (c) must be a guess - and one sometimes very difficult to make. Despite this problem, we consider the owner earnings figure, not the GAAP figure, to be the relevant item for valuation purposes...All of this points up the absurdity of the 'cash flow' numbers that are often set forth in Wall Street reports. These numbers routinely include (a) plus (b) - but do not subtract (c).Warren Buffet
At first glance this definition of owner earnings appears to be nearly identical to that of free cash flow. However, there are important differences. Owner earnings is the amount of cash which can be pulled out of a company each year if capital expenditures are limited to only maintenance capex - only capital expenditures needed to maintain the current business. The amount of capital expenditure listed on the cash flow statement is the total, comprised of both maintenance capital expenditures and growth capital expenditures. Furthermore, this maintenance capex should be averaged over a few years to smooth out the result.
Another difference between free cash flow and owner earnings is that free cash flow includes changes in working capital. In general, working capital fluctuates from year to year, and these fluctuations clearly should not be counted. They would have the effect of unduly inflating or depressing the picture of profitability. Only necessary changes in working capital needed to maintain the business should included in the calculation of owner earnings, so they can usually be ignored. The formula for owner earnings is as follows:

Owner Earnings =

Net Income

+ Depreciation, amortization, etc.

+ Non-cash charges (not related to working capital)

+ Interest payments adjusted for taxes

- Average maintenance capital expenditures

Permanent changes in working capital

It's important to remember what owner earnings represent: it is the average amount of cash which can be pulled out of a business after all expenditures necessary to maintain the business and the current unit volume. I've added interest payments since I want to calculate the profit I would be able to pull out each year assuming I bought the company outright and paid off all outstanding debt.
Owner earnings allows you to value a company based on its current profitability. However, maintenance capex is not a generally available number and is often difficult to determine. Using the total capital expenditure will most likely underestimate the profitability of the company.
If you use owner earnings in a discounted cash flow calculation, you must be careful. If only maintenance capex is subtracted then projecting growth faster than inflation doesn't make any sense since the growth isn't being paid for. If you project real growth after inflation, you must use the total average capital expenditures.

面对一大堆的理财资讯而束手无策?简单3步骤让你得心应手!- 红枫

网路的诞生让资讯无限成长是不可避免的趋势,相对来说知识取得成本也愈来愈便宜,只要懂得从中「断舍离」自己想要资讯的人,无形中成长的速度都会比较快一 些。像我现在吸收理财资讯的来源,中英文加起来就超过100个,跟我当初学理财时每周看几本杂志,每月看一丶两本书完全不同。只是那麽多的来源,要如何在 有限时间找出对我有帮助的资讯呢?我想这也是很多朋友共通的问题。
用工具有系统地吸收资讯
答案就是善用工具。我个人目前常用的工具是 Feedly丶Evernote丶Facebook,稍後我会详细把实际作法拆解出来,在开始前要先告诉你整个系统的核心观念:
让工具把资讯自动带到你眼前,眼睛跟脑袋只负责归纳跟吸收。
人类脑袋能处理的资源有限,如果你花愈多时间在寻找资料,就压缩愈多吸收知识的空间。但大部份寻找资料的过程都是重复的,比如富朋友每周都会更新文章,如 果你每次都得经过 Google 搜寻才来到部落格,那就太浪费你的时间。同理,如果你想要吸收的资讯来源超过十个,那每天光是这样做就耗掉不少时间,更别说在下班後疲累状态做这些事。所以第一点要做到的就是:让资讯自动出现在你面前。
当资讯出现在你面前後,第二点就是要判断跟吸收,分出哪些资讯是不需要丶现在需要丶未来可能需要;不需要的就略过,现在需要的就尽快吸收,未来可能需要的就是归纳到资料库里,日後再回头来阅读。
整理理财资讯
整理理財資訊
第二点是高效率的关键,但也最花脑力,所以必须将脑袋CPU留到这里运转,不然超频时就会放弃了。好比我的核心投资是股票,所以几乎跟股票相关的资讯对我 都是「现在需要」,如果遇到跟股票较不相关的资讯但我未来可能会用到的,就会先放进「未来需要」区,日後再回头来阅读。
有句话是「你的时间在哪里,成就就在哪里。」区分现在与未来需要就能帮我达成,可以让我更专心的聚焦在有用资讯上,但又不会烦恼漏接其他资讯。刚开始学习 理财最怕的就是什麽赚钱机会都想尝试,此时不少人就会顾此失彼,本来在学股票,过阵子看到房地产好赚又去学房地产,不然就是学外汇丶学创业……,结果都是 在原地踏步。反倒是坚持走原本设定好学习路的人,几过数年因为持续钻研而有所成。当然你也可以在当下选择改走其他路,但一定要将资源放在「现在最需要」的 地方,然後坚持下去。
喘口气,回顾一下重点:
吸收資訊要點
吸收资讯要点
掌握这两个要点,接下来就是用工具帮我们完成这些事。
3 步骤用工具完成搜集.处理.吸收
步骤1:收集资讯
用 Feedly 收集 RSS
现在的网站几乎都有提供 RSS 订阅,而我会将长期追踪网站的 RSS 透过 Feedly 来「通知」我,这样就不用花时间去查看最新文章,只要被动地等新文章出现在我面前。只是通常我较少在 Feedly 上阅读文章,我只会用 Evernote 把它们收集起来。在 Feedly 上最主要就是能透过标题快速抓取我要的新资讯。(注:如果你的量不多,用Email 订阅电子报也很方便)
用 Evernote 将资讯暂收起来待阅读
Evernote 有个功能就是滑鼠右键一按就将网页资讯收集起来,所以我都透过它帮我把「待处理」资讯先收起来。只要是我在网路上看到任何感兴趣的资讯(包括从 Feedly 收集及 Facebook 的动态消息),不阅读先收进待处理区先。(如果你尚未用过Evernote,目前有赠送新会员1个月专业版活动,透过此推荐连结注册就可以取得)
用 Facebok 专页追踪即刻消息
如果来源会在脸书上提供及时短资讯,比如富朋友不定期就会在脸书上分享个人理财短心得,像这类的我就会加入脸书专页(按赞),这样我就能在FB上第一时间 追踪对方大小事。同样如果遇到感兴趣的资讯,我也会再用 Evernote 收到待处理区里。(如果你还没加入我的脸书,现在就是好时机)
目前为止都还只是让资讯自动出现在我面前,步骤2才开始要动到大脑处理。
步骤2:处理资讯
每经过一丶两天,在我的 Evernote 待处理区里就会有许多对我可能有帮助的资讯,但不见得真的需要用到,所以这时我经由三个原则「不需要」「现在需要」「未来需要」去过滤资讯,目标是将待处理区的暂存资讯都清空掉,这样日後再装新资讯时就不会感觉满出来。
不需要的资讯当然就是直接删除。步骤 2 关键是怎麽处理现在与未来需要资讯,这时我就会用Evernote 的功能直接开启两个资料夹,一个叫「待阅读」放入现在需要的资讯,另一个叫「资料库」放入未来需要的资讯,然後透过设定标签方式做初步分类,日後回顾时就 比较快。
步骤3:阅读并做适当作笔记
来到这步骤,大量的网路资讯已经被过滤成要尽快吸收的有用知识,而你的诉求就是安排时间把待阅读区里的资讯阅读完,并且透过做笔记帮助大脑吸收。随着你对 某个领域的知识吸收愈多,你整理的速度也就愈快,或是有些资讯你只需阅读当作复习而已,到时如果还有时间想跨到不同领域学习时,就再从之前搜集的「资料 库」里找出你需要的资料就好。
工具会变,原则不变
以上就是我每天固定吸收理财资讯的方式,透过搜集丶处理丶吸收三个步骤,一点一滴帮自己建立理财知识。如果说我在投资理财上能有今天还算满意的成绩,长久 接触理财资讯是一大关键。目前对我来说,Evernote 是搜集资讯最方便的工具,平时如果脑中有闪过想分享的文章题材,我也会立即透过 Evernote 来记录(手机丶PC丶iPad三者同步),电脑玩物的站长就将Evernote视为第二个脑袋,这点我觉得形容的非常恰当。
然而不变的原则还是在搜集→整理归纳→阅读吸收,就算你不习惯用数位工具,这原则还是很适用,因为在资讯随时淹没我们的世代,要学习将大脑资源聚焦在「现在最需要的」地方,至於搜集这部份就尽量透过规律丶简单的方式去完成!
Source: leinvest

避開3個風險,找到真正定存股!

「任何好機會,在找到它的缺點以後,我就安心了!」-喬治.索羅斯
在了解定存股各種潛在風險後,大膽的買進吧!

1. 流行風險

金融海嘯後和歐債危機後,恐懼仍存在大多數人心中,
這時候定存股概念往往會熱門起來,
 
當大家都在流行買定存股時,市場上提供的殖利率一定相對降低;
反之,
市場動能再起後,定存股又慢慢被人遺忘,殖利率也會逐漸上升。
 
「當定存股退流行後,常常是最佳的買進時機!」
 
 

2. 永久衰退風險

發揮定存股最大的效益在於長期的持有,
因此當碰上衰退時機,分辨出企業是暫時性或 永久性衰退是 決定成敗的重要因素!
 
永久性衰退對 長期投資人來說非常危險,尤其是看到產業結構大幅變動,快逃!
 
反之,暫時性衰退的當下 殖利率看似下降,也造成股價驟跌,
但長期而言,企業獲利能力若能 恢復從前水準,
暫時性衰退將提供絕佳的高殖利率買點!
 
「關鍵在於評估公司未來的盈利,而非過去與現在的盈利!」
 

3. 配息來源

穩定配發現金,常是定存股重要的篩選條件。
企業配現金的含意為:
「無法將該資金做更有效的投資,此時發還給投資人是最有效的運用。」
 
因此拿公積配息的企業,小心有詐!
公積就是企業過去累積的盈餘,
當企業沒賺多少錢,甚至賠錢,卻拿過去賺的錢配現金,營造穩定配息的假象,
這種狀況務必要小心。
只選擇高現金殖利率的股票,雖然對現金流很有幫助,但也是種機會成本!
若企業能將盈餘做更有效運用,我們就不用為配發的資金運用傷腦筋!
「優質的定存股可以不限於高現金殖利率,最重要的是企業強大的盈利能力!」
 
http://www.cmoney.tw/notes/note-detail.aspx?cid=22814&nid=7077

Saturday, November 23, 2013

4潜在因素支撑发马前景

吉隆坡23日讯)尽管发马(PHARMA,7081,主板贸服股)最新季度的业绩表现稍微低于市场预测,但分析员基于4大潜在利好因素,而维持该股「买进」投资评级。

这4项利好因素,分别是扩充印尼与中东的业务丶来自欧盟的潜在合约丶私人领域潜在商机以及稳定的股息派发。

无论如何,由于发马最新业绩不如预期,导致该股在过去一周呈跌,其股价从周一的4.80令吉,下挫至周五的4.60令吉,一周之内跌20仙或4.17%。

发马在上周一(11月18日)公布的2013财政年第三季(截至9月30日止)净利为375万1000令吉,较去年同期的2524万7000令吉,下跌85.14%;营业额则为4亿4080万7000令吉,较去年同期的4亿2646万令吉,上涨3.36%。

首9个月而言,该公司净利从去年同期的6964万5000令吉,下滑50.63%,至3438万7000令吉;营业额则从去年同期的13亿2994万2000令吉,上升3.67%,至13亿7877万9000令吉。

该公司宣布派发每股3仙的第三次单层中期股息,将于12月2日除权。该公司首9个月的每股股息已增至9.82仙。

丰隆投行分析员表示,虽然发马2013财政年首9个月的核心净利5310万令吉(按年跌37%)占该分析员全年预测的75.9%;但是,他认为,该业绩稍微低于预期。

他补充说,发马的营业额表现不如预测,主要是被特许权业务拖累。

「发马2013财政年第三季营业额按年提升3.4%,但按季比较则持平。其营业额按年成长主要是私人领域以及印尼营运的贡献较为强劲。然而,特许经营业务则持平,因为政府医院方面因检讨预算,而放慢购买药品的速度。」

无论如何,分析员称,发马管理层预期该公司下个季度的需求将会增加,因医院已在10月获得新的预算配额。

此外,该公司2013财政年首9个月的扣除利息丶税项丶折旧及摊销前盈利(EBITDA)为1亿1780万令吉,按年下跌19.7%;赚幅则下跌2.5%,至8.5%,受物流与分销业务较低的毛盈利赚幅与更高的营运成本拖累。

然而,随着发马获得来自欧盟(EU)颁发的认证,该公司管理层有信心取得来自欧洲药厂的制药合约。

分析员指出,该公司将持续维持符合核心业务市场策略的谨慎风险管理,以减轻国内需求因季节性因素而下跌的压力。

鉴于其业绩低于预期,分析员将该公司2013至2015财政年的每股盈利预测,分别下调6.7%丶9.8%及9.1%。

同 时,按2014财政年的14.5倍本益比,将该公司的目标价从5.32令吉,下修2.4%,至5.19令吉;但分析员依然维持该股「买进」投资评级,因为 预计发马将获得数项潜在正面因素的支撑,包括将扩充印尼与中东的制药业务丶来自欧盟的潜在合约丶私人领域的商机丶以及每个季度稳定的股息派发。

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

达卡经营医院受看好 柔医药保健应声涨

吉隆坡20日讯)柔佛医药保健(KPJ,5878,主板贸服股)进军孟加拉达卡经营医院,市场看好这项协议,不过,相信新医院要到2016财政年之后,才会对公司带来正面的贡献。

虽然如此,投资者对这项发展的乐观情绪,今日反映在公司股价表现,该股今日一度上涨12仙或1.94%。

该股最终回吐部份涨幅,收在6.28令吉,全天涨10仙,或1.62%,成交量达87万5100股。

柔佛医药保健周二宣布签署为期10年,可选择延长5年的租赁及营运协议,经营当地一所新医院,这家有250张病床的医院预计将在2015年全面运作。

这项协议的主要条件分别是,前5年无需支付租金,第6年起,以税後盈利的10%作为租金。

作为一项公私合夥计划--该医院必须为30%的病人提供免费医药服务,作为企业社会责任的一部份。这项交易预计将在2014财政年第2季完成。

安联投行正面看待这项协议,因为租金条款对公司有利,同时也无需做出额外的资本开销。而柔佛医药保健之前已经有在达卡经营医院的经验,应该驾轻就熟。

达证券分析员指出,孟加拉目前面对医生,医务人员及护士不足的问题。

柔佛医药保健希望这家医院提供更有素质的医疗服务,该公司将需要引进专科医生,护士及其他相关人员。

此外,有特别医药需要的病人,也可以被转送到该公司在大马的医院进行治疗。

扩大南亚地区业务

达证券分析员指出,这项协议也将让柔佛医药保健扩大南亚地区的业务。目前该公司的海外业务主要是在印尼丶澳洲及泰国。

安联投行认为,这项交易可以让柔佛医药保健在没有动用额外资本开销的情况下,扩充业务。

柔佛医药保健在这项医院的营运活动下,预料将只涉及直接的营运开销,包括人力丶药品及设备。

包括这家医院在内,该公司将有10家医院即将营运,其中3家将在2013财政年开业。

分析员指出,这项医院经营协议预料要在营运3年之後,才会有盈利,也就是在2016财政年。

分析员维持其盈利预测,因为新医院首2年的亏损相信也不会太显着。

达证券将该公司的目标价维持在7.45令吉,及「买入」评级。

不过,分析员也指出,未来几年新医院将面对开业的过度期,盈利表现料受影响。

然而,一旦这些医院开始赚钱,该公司将挥发成长潜能。

安联投行分析员则给予该股「买进」评级,目标价是6.03令吉。

东南亚买家 抢伦敦预售屋

(新加坡丶伦敦19日讯)英国最大不动产投资信托公司Land证券集团估计,伦敦市预售屋有2/3的买主来自东南亚。

Land证券住宅主管艾薛尔比(Tom Eshelby)在新加坡接受访问时指出,来自东南亚的买主中,新加坡占了1/3,香港占了另1/3,马来西亚和泰国合计占最後1/3。

新加坡和香港陆续对房市采取降温措施,促使买主向海外寻觅投资。新加坡要求买主最高贷款成数需与所得呈一定比率,并调高印花税和资本利得税。香港则在不到3年6度调高最低头期款成数,今年2月把超过200万港元(82万令吉)的房地产印花税一律调高一倍。

艾薛尔比说:「新加坡和香港对房地产设限,已妨碍且瘫痪市场。当地买主已对本地市场不再心存幻想,因此纷纷向海外找出路。」

艾薛尔比表示,伦敦市中心区房价未来5年预料会上涨25%。他说,伦敦房价这5年来大幅领先英国其他地区,而英国其他地区房价尚未回到2008年的水平。

「伦敦就算表现落後,也不会差到那里。」他说,全球高资产净值者有上百万之谱,而伦敦新屋不到上万,暗示供需严重失衡。

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Westports Holdings - Call At This Port

Via  Westports,  investors  can  participate  in  South-East  Asia’s accelerating  trading  activities.  With  core  net  profit  potentially expanding  at  a  CAGR  of  4.6%  over  FY12-15F,  the  port  operator  is deemed  as  a  cash  cow  that  will  deliver  an  average  annual  FCF  of MYR484m  over  FY14F-18F.  We  initiate  coverage  on  the  stock  with  a BUY. Our DCF-based FV of MYR2.84 is premised on a 7.12% WACC.
  • A leader in  Port Klang. Wesports  offers investors a unique opportunity to participate in the heightening trade activities in South-East Asia (SEA).The port’s strategic  location allows the company to  capitalize on  strong trade  growth in SEA. Drewry  Research  expects container throughput in SEA to grow 6.0% annually over FY12-15 vs global troughput’s 5.5%.
  • The P3 alliance.  The P3 alliance is a collaboration between three of the biggest  container  liner  companies,  of  whom  one  is  CMA  CGM, Westports’  biggest  customer.  The  alliance  may  be  a  key  risk  for Westports  as  transhipment  boxes  could  be  diverted  to  PTP,  the alliance’s  transhipment  hub.  We  understand  that  CMA  CGM  has committed  an  annual  capacity  of  600k  twenty-foot  equivalent  units (TEUs) to the P3 alliance. We are of the view that out of this, 400k TEUs will be diverted  annually  from Westports and the remaining 200k TEUs from other transshipment hubs. We estimate tha t volume loss from this alliance may make up 2-5% of total volume.
  • Core  net  profit  growth  of  4.6%  over  FY12-15F.  We  forecast FY13F/14F/15F  core  earnings  at  MYR456m/474m/478m  respectively, buoyed  by  higher  container  throughput  –  which  would  result  in economies of scale  -  and margin expansion. This will imply a 4.6% core net profit CAGR over FY12-15F. The potential revision of the upper band in container tariffs would be a key catalyst to earnings.
  • Initiate  coverage  with  a  BUY.  Our  DCF-based  FV  for  Westports  of MYR2.84  is  premised at a 7.12% WACC. As the company is capable of generating  an  average  annual  FCF  of  MYR484m  for  FY13F-15F,  it  is able  to  commit  to  a  75%  dividend  payout  policy,  which  translates  to yields of 4.1% for FY14F-15F. Our FV of MYR2.84 implies a FY14 P/E of 23x  and EV/EBITDA of  14.2x.  Westports has the highest dividend yield of 4.1% among Malaysian port operators. 
Executive Summary
Leading port operator at Port Klang. Westports, one of the leading port operators along the Straits of Malacca, offers investors a unique opportunity to participate in the growing  pace  of  trade  activities  in  SEA.  It is one of  the  two  port  operators at  Port Klang besides Northport,  a Bursa  Malaysia-listed port operator  under the entity NCB Holdings (NCB MK, NEUTRAL, FV: MYR3.50).  Port Klang is one of  the world’s 15 busiest  ports  by  container  throughput,  serving  as  a  key  transhipment  hub  in  the Straits  of  Malacca  and  as  a  main  gateway  for  import/export  cargo  for  Peninsular Malaysia.
Westports’  throughput  growth  outpaces  growth  at  Port  Klang.  Port  Klang  has registered  strong container throughput growth, registering a 8.3% CAGR from 2002 to 2012, in line with the 8.3% global growth projected by Drewry in the same period. Port Klang’s growth was primarily driven by transhipment cargo, which saw a 10.0% CAGR  from  2002  to  2012  versus  5.8%  for  import/export  cargo.  Over  the  same period, Westports managed to grow its container volume at a faster rate of 13.2%, thanks to growth from key customers and high operating efficiency. Overall, its share of container throughput at Port Klang rose from 39% in 2001 to 69% in 2012. Strategic  location  to  benefit  from  higher  trade  activities.  Westports  is  well positioned along the main trade lane in the  Straits of Malacca and is exposed to the Asia-Europe and intra-Asia trade lanes. The port’s strategic location allows Westports to  capture  the  strong  trade  growth  in  South-East  Asia  (SEA).  Drewry  expects container throughput in SEA to grow 6.0% annually over FY12-FY15 versus 5.5% for global throughput.
Efficient  cost  management.  Westports  believes  it  has  one  of  the  highest  port productivity in the world, consistently achieving 35 moves per hour (mph) for vessels longer  than  300  metres.  According  to  Drewry,  Westports achieved  169,271 moves per crane per year in 2011, ahead of other big names in the same trade lane such as PSA and PTP. Westports’ EBITDA margins are also among the highest in the region. Far East and SEA  markets to propel container growth.  The  rise of the emerging economies and the trend in outsourcing production lines have led to improved global trade  flows  across  all  transport  modes.  The  increasing  demand  for  the containerisation of manufacturing products and goods has also expanded across a wider spectrum due to its convenience and cost effectiveness in terms of time and costs. The rising importance of Asia’s economies as global manufacturers of a wide range of products and merchandise  –  thanks to their cheaper cost of production  – has  made  the  Far  East  a  leader  in  container  throughput,  accounting  for approximately 39% of the global container trade share, according to Drewry. Of this
share, China alone accounts for 67% of the traffic from the Far East, or equivalent to 26% of the total global trade in 2011. SEA, meanwhile, accounts for 14% of global container trade  –  a level  that  this  region  has managed to maintain  since  the early 90s. Drewry projects that global container throughput would grow by 5.5% annually from  2012  to  2015,  mostly  driven  by  the  Far  East  and  SEA  markets.  These  two regions  will  contribute  to  the  bulk  of  the  TEU  throughput  when  compared  to  other regions, due to their stronger economic growth prospects.
Straits of Malacca the world’s busiest trade lane. As the Straits of Malacca region - which comprises neighbouring SEA countries ie Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia  -  is at a key crossroad for container liners, it is a favourite port of call for transhipment  activities.  It  is  also  one  of  the  busiest  waterways  in  the  world,  as  an estimated  30%  of  global  goods  and  80%  of  Japan’s  oil  needs  pass  through  the channel,  according  to  the  US  Energy  Information  Administration  (EIA).  With  some 50,000  vessels  plying  this  route  annually,  it  serves  as  the  main  line  for  the Transpacific and Europe-Far East routes, as well as the Intra-Asia and Intra SouthEast  Asia  routes.  According  to  Drewry,  container  volume  in  the  straits  area  has grown at a CAGR of 11% since 1990, outpacing the global CAGR of 9.5%.
Westports’  growing momentum.  Since Westports commenced operations in 1996, container  throughput  (both  gateway  and  transhipments)  has  been  chalking  up  a CAGR of more than 11% according to Drewry. The throughput growth was boosted by  aggressive  efforts  to  ramp  up  capacity  to  meet  its  target  for  high  transhipment volume,  which  currently  accounts  for  72%  of  the  port’s  total  volume.  Westports’ efficient throughput handling, which ranks fairly high in terms of crane productivity, has made the terminal a preferred port of call for transhipment  cargo in the Straits of Malacca.  Its  ability  to  generate  high  transhipment  volume  has  also  allowed  it  to garner  a  bigger  market  share  of  Port  Klang’s  total  throughput  at  69%  (Northport: 31%). As Port Klang is a national load gateway for indigenous trade, this gives liners more incentive to make Westports the preferred port of call. Its efficient throughput handling capability and highly accommodative modern port infrastructure allows  it to support vessels with capacities of up to 18,000 TEUs.
Westports  offers  the  more  flexibility  to  liners.  Although  Northport  is  viewed  as Westports'  closest  competitor,  the  latter  has  an  acclaimed  crane  productivity  track record  in  container  handling,  according  to  Drewry.  However,  Westports  does  not directly  compete  for  volume  with  Northport.  Instead,  its  immediate  competitors  are PTP and PSA. While the latter two are close to Westports'  efficiency  (measured by crane productivity), only the latter can offer customers the benefit of efficient handling capability  coupled  with  its  lower  pricing  per  TEU.  Furthermore,  as  Westports  is situated in Port Klang, this also gives liners an incentive to call at the port, given its higher number of container exchanges per call - from its direct services in addition to transhipment boxes.  However,  as  both  PTP  and  PSA  are expanding  their  terminal capacities moving forward, we cannot ignore the  fact that the race to grow  market share will get more competitive.
P3  alliance  is  a  key  risk.   The  P3  alliance  is  a  collaborative  agreement  between three  of  the  biggest  container  liner  companies:  Maersk,  Mediterranean  Shipping Company  (MSC)  and  CMA  CGM.  CMA  CGM  is  Westports  biggest  customer, accounting for 36% of the latter’s total container throughput handled in FY12. The P3 alliance,  which  is  expected  to  begin  in  June  2014,  could  pose  as  a  key  risk  for Westports,  as  transhipment  boxes  could  be  diverted  to  PTP,  the  alliance’s transhipment  hub.   We  understand  from  management  that  CMA  CGM  contributed about  2.5m  TEUs  to  Westports  in  2012,  of  which  1m  TEUs  could  potentially  be exposed  to  the  P3  routes.  The  P3  service  routing  announced  by  CMA  CGM,  if implemented, will result in a revision of port calls  -  Port Klang’s weekly service calls will  be  reduced  to  six  from  10  out  of  the  26  proposed  for  the  AsiaEurope/Mediterranean  trade  lanes. We have  factored  this  impact  into  our  earnings model, where we expect the number of boxes diverted from Westports to PTP to be as  much  as  200k  TEUs  worth  in  FY14F  and  400k  TEUs  annually  from  FY15F onwards. As  CMA CGM has committed to an annual total capacity of 600k TEUs to P3,  we think our assumption of 400k TEUs being diverted away from Westports is fair. The remaining 200k TEUs will be  lost by other  ports. Other risks include: i) high customer concentration; ii) a lack of cost  flexibility as the majority of port workers are directly  hired;  iii)  a  slowing  global  economy,  which  may  affect  Port  Klang’s throughput, especially for Asia-Europe routes; and iv) intense competition from PSA and PTP.
Solid  throughput  growth.  We  conservatively  expect  Westports  to  achieve  a container  throughput  CAGR  of  4.8%  for  FY12-15F.  This  is  lower  than  Drewry’s projection of 6.0% for SEA for FY12-15F and its historical 8.6% CAGR for FY08-12. We  believe Westports  will  see  slower  volume  growth  in  FY14F  due  to  the  loss  of TEUs  diverted  to  PTP  upon  the  commencement  of  the  upcoming  P3  alliance,  if approved by regulators. We also forecast that revenue from container value-added services to grow at a 12.1% CAGR over FY12-15F as Westports attempts to beef up ancillary income. We expect bulk throughput to grow  at a  6.0% CAGR over FY12-15F.Core net profit CAGR of 4.6% over FY12-15F. We are forecasting FY13F/14F/15F core net earnings at MYR456m/474m/478m respectively, buoyed by higher container throughput (which leads to economies of scale) and margin expansion. This implies a 4.6%  core  net  profit  CAGR  for  FY12-15F.  A  revision  in  the  upper  band  of  the container tariff would  be a major catalyst to  lift earnings. Note that  container tariffs have not been revised over the past three decades.
Initiate coverage with a BUY. We value Westports with a DCF approach to derive a FV  of  MYR2.84,  premised  at  a  7.12%  WACC  (see  valuation  table  overleaf).  The company is committed to a 75% dividend payout policy, which translates   to dividend yields  of 4.1% for FY14-15F.  Our FV of  MYR2.84 implies a FY14 P/E of 22.7x and EV/EBITDA of  14.2x,  which is at a premium to its peer  average of 14.5x and  8.9x respectively. This is justifiable given  its  status as the only listed transhipment port in Asean.  Additonally,  Westports  has  a  high  EBITDA  margin  of  53%  and  has  the highest dividend yield of 4.1% among Malaysia’s listed port operators.
Investment Merits
Leading port operator at Port Klang with a 69% market share Westports,  one  of  the  leading  port  operators  along  the  Straits  of  Malacca,  offers investors a unique opportunity to participate in the growing pace of trade activities in SEA.  It  is  one  of  the  two  port  operators  at  Port  Klang  besides  Northport,  also  a Bursa-listed port operator. According  to Drewry, Port Klang as a whole  is among the world’s 15 busiest ports by container throughput, serving as a key transhipment hub in  the  Straits  of  Malacca  and  as  a  main  gateway  for  import/export  cargo  for Peninsular Malaysia.
Westports’  throughput  growth  outpaces  growth  at  Port  Klang.  According  to historical  data  compiled  by  Drewry,  Port  Klang  has  been  experiencing  strong container throughput growth, registering a 8.3% CAGR in 2002-2012. This is in line with the 8.3% global growth projected by Drewry for the same period. Port Klang’s growth was primarily driven by transhipment cargo, which saw a 10.0% CAGR from 2002 to 2012 versus 5.8% for import/export cargo. Over the same period, Westports managed  to  grow  its container  volume  at  a faster  rate  of 13.2%,  thanks  to  growth from key customers and  its  high operating efficiency. Overall, its share of container throughput at Port Klang rose from 39% in 2001 to 69% in 2012.
Source: RHB
Labels: WPRTS

Suria Capital Holdings - Multi-Year Growth Potential

Suria, which  manages  eight major ports in Sabah, was  recently  in the spotlight  when  its  joint venture  (JV)  with SBC  is  finally  started to bear fruit  via  the  Jesselton  Quay  development  project.  We  foresee  this providing  multi-year  growth  potential  for  the  group.  We  initiate coverage on Suria  with a BUY call. Our  DCF-based MYR3.50  FV  implies a FY14F P/E of 16.9x, in line with the industry average.
  • Sabah’s port operator.    Suria  operates  several  major ports in Sabah, namely:  i)  Kota  Kinabalu  Port,  ii)  Sapangar  Bay  Oil  Terminal,  iii) Sandakan Port,  iv)  Lahad Datu Port,  v)  Kunak Port,  vi)  Kudat Port, vii) Tawau  Port  and  viii)  Sapangar  Bay  Container  Port.  The  group  also operates other port-related businesses as well.
  • Details on the Jesselton Quay project.  Suria  recently came under the spotlight  when  the  long-awaited  Jesselton  Quay  development  project started  to  make  progress.  The  group  signed  a  JV  agreement  on  the project  with  SBC  Corp  (SBC  MK,  NR)  on  21  May  and  received shareholders’ approval at  its  recent EGM.  Hence, we believe the project will  kickstart very soon.  We view the salient terms  of  the agreement  as being favourable  to Suria  as it  only needs  to provide the land  and assist and facilitate in the project’s implementation. All other cost and expenses relating  to  the  project,  including  implementation  and  completion  of Jesselton Quay,  will be borne by SBC.  The group is also  guaranteed  a minimum return of MYR324m in cash, or in kind, over eight tranches.
  • Initiate  coverage with a  BUY. As  Suria’s core operations are expected to  experience  organic  earnings  growth,  we  apply  conservative assumptions into our forecasts. W e also did  not factor in any tariff hikes. As it is, we find Suria still undervalued vs its closes peer. By comparison, Integrax  (INTEG  MK,  BUY,  FV:  MYR2.32)  is  trading  at  a  higher  P/E multiple.  Despite the recent rally in  Suria’s  share price,  we still think  the stock  has  not  priced  in  the  cash  inflow  from  the  Jesselton  Quay  JV. Thus, we initiate coverage on Suria  with a BUY call  and a MYR3.50  FV, which is based on a 20% discount on its DCF (at a WACC of 7.2%). Our FV gives an implied FY14F P/E of  16.9x, which is largely in line with the industry average.
Company Highlights
About Suria.  Suria  was listed in 1996 and was originally established as a financial conglomerate. In 2004, the group  shifted its business focus to port services  following a  major  restructuring.  During  that  corporate  exercise,  Suria  acquired  the  business operations of Sabah’s key ports from Sabah Ports Authority  via a major privatisation exercise.  The  terms  of  the  privatisation  agreement  come  with  a  30-year  port concession (since Sep 2004), which can be extended for a further 30-year period. Concession agreement. Based on the privatisation  agreement, the amount payable by  the  Group  for  lease  of  the  land  is  tiered  based  on  the  year  of  the  concession.
Currently,  Suria’s  concession  is  at  its  10th year,  during  which  the  annual  lease payment (payable to  the port  authority) amounts to MYR3m. Suria will also incur a charge  of  RM0.75  per  tonne  of  cargo  handled  in  excess  of  the  annual  threshold throughput  of  10m  tonnes.  As  Suria  approaches  its  11th year  in  2014,  the  annual lease payment will be accordingly raised to MYR5m from MYR3m previously.
Port  operator.  Suria  currently  manages  eight  major ports in Sabah. Originally, the group managed: i)  Kota Kinabalu Port,  ii) Sapangar Bay Oil  Terminal,  iii)  Sandakan Port, iv) Lahad Datu Port, v) Kunak Port, vi) Tawau Port, and vii) Kudat Port. In 2007, it  built  a  container  terminal  –  Sapangar  Bay  Container  Port  –  at  a  cost  of  some MYR400m and shifted Kota Kinabalu port’s container operations to Sapangar Bay.
Other business segments.  Apart from port operations, Suria  has also ventured into other  businesses,  such  as:  i)  equipment  supply  and  maintenance,  ii)  logistics  and bunkering  services,  iii)  contract  and  engineering,  and  iv)  ferry  terminal  operations. Nonetheless,  port  operations are  the  group’s main core business,  contributing about 83.2% to total 2012  revenue. This is  followed  by  its logistics and  bunkering services division, with 9.1% (See Figure 2).
Stable margins.  As shown  in the table above  (Table 1),  Suria’s  revenue  has been fluctuating  over  the  past  four  years.  This  was  largely  due  to  the  instability  in  the global economy, which has  impacted  throughput volume. Nonetheless, we note that the  group’s margins were  relatively strong  during this period  –  maintaining  at around 40%. Gross margins further improved in 1HFY13 to 44% despite lower y-o-y revenue contributions.  Apart from that, Suria  has been able to keep  its net margins  at around 19-23%  for  the  past  four  years,  thus  keeping  annual  earnings  stable  at  around MYR50m.
Ports performance at a glance. As mentioned earlier, Suria’s main core business is its  port operations. Its other business divisions’ contributions  to  group earnings are quite minimal. Among Suria’s eight ports, Sapangar Bay Container Port is the busiest –  running  almost  at  full  capacity,  while  the  other  seven  are  running  at  50-60% utilisation rate.  The cargo handled by its  ports varies, ranging  from container  and dry bulk  to  liquid bulk and  roll-on/roll-off (RORO).  Cargoes at Suria’s ports  are  mostly for import/export,  unlike  ports  in  West  Malaysia  where  transshipment  volumes  are relatively  much  higher  vis-à-vis  Sabah’s  ports.  The  total  throughput  handled  by Suria’s  ports  in  2012  amounted  to  22.5m  tonnes  and  374k  TEUs  (twenty-foot equivalent units. The types of cargo and annual tonnage handled by the group’s ports are illustrated in Tables 2 and 3 below:
Restructuring logistics and bunkering. Suria’s logistics and bunkering division has not  been  performing  well,  but  the  group  has  identified  it  as  a  future  growth  node, given  Sabah’s  strategic  location  between  Oceania and Far  East Asia. Hence, Suria has plans to monetise such  an  advantage. This division has  –  since October  –  been partnered up with  Singapore-based bunkering firm  Petro Summit to develop Sabah into  a  new  regional  bunkering  hub  within  the  Brunei,  Indonesia,  Malaysia  and  the Philippines-East Asean  Growth Area  (BIMP-EAGA)  economic zone. Management is confident  that  this  segment  will  contribute  positively  to  Suria  in  FY14,  although  it expects the contribution to  remain marginal  for the time being. Management is of the view that such a marginal contribution is still expected to  at least  curb losses, which may prove a drag on Suria’s overall performance.
Property  development  an  interesting angle.  Suria’s  share price has been rallying strongly  over  the past few weeks,  and we believe that  this is  largely  spurred by  its potential  property  development  JV  at  Jesselton  Quay,  which  will  finally  come  to fruition.  The  group  signed  a  JV  agreement  venture   with  SBC  Corp  on  21  May  to develop the project on  a prime  piece of land  in Kota Kinabalu. The land  is the former site  of  the  Kota  Kinabalu  container  port  and  is  adjacent  to  Jesselton  Point.  The project is  believed to have  a  net  sellable value of MYR1.8bn and,  according to the salient terms in the agreement, Suria will get an 18% minimum guaranteed profit from the net sellable value, or around MYR324m. This will be paid in eight tranches. In our opinion, Jesselton Quay is not merely a Kota Kinabalu property development project, but is “THE” development that can give rise to other growth opportunities for the state capital,  or  even  Sabah  itself.  We  also  see  it  as  crucial  for  Suria’s  future  growth.
(Please refer to the following section, Jesselton Quay, for more details.)
Source: RHB

转帖] 美國基金:馬股可跑贏大市

吉隆坡14日訊)儘管馬股估值高企導致最近缺乏揚升動力,不過美國基金經理相信馬股可在外圍顛簸局勢中再“跑贏大市”,主要看好整體經濟基本面,惟卻對政府強化土著經濟政策頗有微言。
進行“投資大馬”巡迴展
12家市值共達2千710億令吉的大馬上市公司在美國紐約、波士頓及三藩市進行“投資大馬”巡迴展。
同時,馬銀行研究與美國18名基金經理會面,而他們關心的課題主要圍繞在大馬宏觀經濟管理、2014年度財政預算案的贏家及輸家和股票估值。
該行指出,預算案雖重新攫取市場對大馬宏觀經濟的信心,但股票估值已不顯得廉宜,未來12個月本益比企於15.7倍。
“儘管如此,很多投資者認同在處於外圍波動格局,馬股有望再`跑贏大市’。”
從經濟層面而言,隨行的首相署部長拿督斯里阿都華希則認為,大馬經常賬項盈餘收窄只是暫時性現象,主要受到出口下滑影響。
他對政府深具信心,促使經常賬項保持在盈餘水平,雙赤字的可能性不大。
馬銀行研究也相信美國基金經理看好大馬的宏觀基本面,包括今年下半年及明年的經濟成長將回彈,歸功於外圍需求轉而成為成長推手。
接著,今年第三季貿易盈餘擴大,反映上半年經常賬項盈餘收窄格局已趨穩;政府致力於進行財政整合及改革,而且政治局勢已趨,可讓國陣政府未來3至4年專注於管理經濟。
批土著經濟強化政策開倒車
不過,市場的主要擔憂圍繞在政府強調的土著經濟強化政策,被一些美國基經理視為開倒車的做法。
馬銀行研究維持大馬2013年及2014年各4.5%及5%經濟成長,而富時綜指年杪目標則分別為1830點及1940點。
建築油氣加碼
產業減碼
以領域計,馬銀行研究“加碼”建築及油氣業,成為預算案的大贏家,但“減碼”輸家產業領域。
美國基金經理也對種植業提出多項疑問,包括棕油價格展望及股項估值。
馬銀行研究指出,最近棕油價上探至每公噸2千550令吉符合預期,因為“樹壓”影響棕油供應,不過棕油卻失去價格優勢,因為兩者的差價已收窄。
“我們維持種植業`中和’評級,預計明年棕油平均價為2千600令吉。”
不過,該行收到美國基金經理的回應是大馬種植股昂貴,達到2014年的19倍本益比,相比區域同儕只有11至13倍。
“我們強調這主要是因為國內游資龐大、潛在釋放種植地段為產業發展,加上符合伊斯蘭教義基金的市場擴大,傾向於投資在種植業,進而促使大馬種植股相對具抗跌性及波動性較低。”
領域簡評
馬銀行研究對建築、油氣及產業領域簡評:
●建築:工程不間斷
政府2014年發展開銷撥款雖然按年走低1.3%,但重申展開主要基建計劃,如西海岸大道、擴展關丹港口、金馬士-新山雙軌火車及泛婆羅州大道,確保建築業工程不間斷。
建議買進的大型建築股包括怡保工程(IJM,3336,主板建筑組)及金務大(GAMUDA,5398,主板建筑組)。
●油氣:受惠於減津貼
油氣業主要投資活動主要放在油田探勘及發展上,將對服務提供者起正面效益。
此外,政府削減津貼令油氣業受惠,因為國家石油(Petronas)能將有關資金轉為具生產性的投資。
首選大型油氣股有沙肯石油(SKPETRO,5218,主板貿服組)及阿瑪達(ARMADA,5210,主板貿服組)。
●產業:打房衝擊需求
一系列打房措施,包括提高產業盈利稅、調高外國人買房門檻及取消發展商承擔利息計劃,將影響產業需求,尤其是柔佛依斯干達,因為當地吸引大批外國人。

Property - Post budget property launches

Property
Post budget property launches

Last weekend, YTL Land saw a more subdued crowd at the launch of Block B Fennel@Sentul East condos (vs Block A & D launch in July). This marks one of the first few launches post-Budget 2014. Nevertheless, take-up was still a respectable 80% with selling price between RM700-850psf vs RM650-700psf previously, partly due to better view (KLCC-facing for some units). Absolute prices were from RM750k/unit onwards for 1081sf-1544sf built-up.
YTL Land continued to offer 54 months-DIBS (approval was obtained for the entire development previously) and early bird discount of 3-5%. There was no VIP preview this round (usually held a day earlier for staff and repeat buyers). YTL Land also increased its marketing efforts prior to launch with full-page print advertisements and e-mail blasts.
Selling points for the project include strategic location (<10km from KLCC), good connectivity (potential 2 MRT stations to be integrated with existing 2 LRT + 1 KTM stops), iconic building design & YTL’s strong execution track record. YTL Land still has 1 remaining block to launch for Fennel.
Meanwhile, Sunway also recently saw 85% take-up for Tower A & B Sunway Geo Residences launch in Bandar Sunway two weeks ago. Selling price after discount/rebates was RM760-860psf (10% early bird discount + 6% discount for non-DIBS). Built-up ranged between 829-1496sf with absolute price from RM766k/unit onwards. The project is a JV between Sunway and Mitsui Fudosan (Japan’s largest property developer by revenue).
We have expected property demand to soften post-Budget 2014 as sentiments are affected (at least in the short-term) by increased restrictions to curb speculation (15-30% RPGT from 10-15%, higher minimum price for foreigners, DIBS ban, more transparent pricing) and tighter bank lending. Demand for prime location, affordable housing and landed properties nevertheless should remain resilient. Our sector top picks are Pavilion REIT (Buy/ TP: RM1.60), Wing Tai Malaysia (Buy/ TP: RM2.90) and E&O (Buy/ TP:RM3.10).
Source: HwangDBS Research - 19 Nov 2013

鹏达受惠油气业蓬勃发展

鹏达集团(PANTECH,5125,主板贸服股)于2007年2月上市,核心业务:1)钢管、装置和流量控制产品贸易;2)生产碳钢、铜镍和镍合金配件和装置。
2012年5月,鹏达集团以4500万令吉收购英国的Nautic Steel。在过去30年,Nautic集团是声誉卓越的钢铁产品生产商,产品包括双工和超级双工不钢铁、铜镍和镍合金。
该集团也获得不同国际机构的产品认证,以及与油气大公司例如卡塔尔石油、科威特公司、国油、英国石油、埃索、蚬标和巴西海军等,有非常良好的关系。因此,鹏达集团将可以利用Nautic集团的网络,直接分销产品给这些大公司。
它的生产工厂位于巴生(雪兰莪)、巴西古当(柔佛)以及塔姆沃斯(英国)。
一站式中心至多元化工业
该集团是一站式中心为,工业服务超过20年,分别为油气、石油化学及化学工厂、棕油工厂、棕油提炼厂、油脂化学厂、生物柴油厂、发电厂、提炼和加工厂等。
油气业是公司的最大单一客户,超过50%的收入是来自这个领域,接着是棕油领域(约15到20%)。鹏达集团业务可以分成两个主要领域,即贸易和制造,每个领域为公司贡献50%的营收。
鹏达集团的优势包括:1)2014财年5%的慷慨周息率(行业平均1.3%)、2)吸引人的10倍冲淡后本益比(行业14至15倍)以及稳固的资产负债表 (2014财年上半净负债0.3倍并拥有9700万令吉现金储备),这使得公司可以进行有价值的并购和内部扩张,以在2015年达到取得10亿营收和目 标、4)赚幅和盈利成长来自产能扩充、改善产品组合,以及营运效率,以及5)公司将从我国和巴西油气业蓬勃发展中受惠。
2014财年下半年表现看俏
在上年,鹏达集团取得3亿1600万令吉(2.2%)营收以及2910万令吉(增长8.6%)盈利,主要是来自生产业务的贡献抵销贸易疲弱的不利冲击。整 体而言,贸易和制造业务表现都会看俏,原因为1)区域油气领域工程合约的发出开始增加,以及2)最近收购英国Nautic Steel后将从新市场中取得营收。
美实施不锈钢管反倾销冲击微
鹏达集团表示,美国国际贸易委员会在今年6月28日表决,对从大马、越南和泰国进口的不锈钢管实施反倾销措施,会影响旗下子公司—————鹏达不锈与合金 工业私人有限公司(PSA),因此,它会面对的风险包括:1)公司正考虑诉讼;2)积极将产品转至高档不锈钢产品(这类产品不受反倾销措施的影响,以及比 不锈钢管拥有更高的赚幅);以及3)积极开拓其他有潜能的市场,例如南美洲和欧洲国家。
尽管面对这方面的冲击,但是达证券对鹏达集团的2014至2016财年展望保持乐观。
鹏达集团表示,有关措施对公司盈利冲击很小,因为在2014财年贡献预计少于3%营业额,预计不会严重冲击整体业绩。假设净赚幅只有8%,它在2014财年蒙受的损失为190万令吉(占总盈利的2%)。
这些小损失,也将地被以下因素所抵销:1)英国产能扩充这将使得它的盈利增长有50%是来自Nautic,以及2)蓬勃的营收入来自鹏达集团现有油气客户所颁发的油气合约。
累积客户群入行门槛高
一个有效率的初入行者,它必须要提供种类广泛的产品以及充足的货源,以及时地应付客户的需求,这包括庞大的储存空间。
鹏达集团已经拥有一个庞大的钢管、装置和流量控制产品一站式中心,以应付区域客户的需求,拥的产品种类超过2万种,这使得它可以为客户提供及时和全面的服务。公司的每一样产品都拥有证书,以达到油气领域高安全和品质的要求。
维修业务收入稳定
除了来自新计划的销售之外,该公司也拥有现有客户的例常维修订单。其实,维修合约的需求为鹏达集团提供稳定的收入,这一方面的业务每年为鹏达集团贡献约40%的营收。
为了可以与鹏达集团竞争,一个竞争者可能必须要短时间累积庞大的客户群。
然而,这是不可能的,因为鹏达集团花了好长的时间建立与客户的关系,以及获得油气公司的批准交易。目前,该公司拥有超过600名的客户。
合约盈利保持正面
达证券对合约的流量和盈利保持正面看法,因为国油和其生产分享合约伙伴的油气开销将会增加。来自上游领域的油气合约最终将会让下游领域业者受惠,包括鹏达集团。
此外,Nautic Steels预料将会继续为该公司的盈利和赚幅增长做出贡献。
Nautic Steels在2014财年的盈利也备受看好,因为它的产能扩张(按年增30%)和安装新自动化机械将带来贡献。
免责声明
本文分析仅供参考,并非推荐购买或脱售。投资前请咨询专业金融师。
慧眼 电邮:shares888@yahoo.com

Hock Seng Lee - Proxy to Sarawak growth: No let-up in development agenda Buy

-  We maintain BUY on Hock Seng Lee Bhd (HSL), with a sumof-parts fair value of RM2.48/share, which includes a PE of 8x against its 3-year average forward earnings for its construction division.
-  We came away convinced from a visit to Sarawak last week that HSL will continue to benefit from the infrastructure development within and outside the Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy (SCORE).
-  Crucially, we learned that marine- and water-related specialist HSL has presented to the state Cabinet its proposals for the second phase of the Kuching central wastewater management project, which extends the geographical reach of the system. The cost of the second phase is estimated at RM700mil-RM800mil.
-  We believe the package could be awarded by early next year, along with the O&M of the wastewater treatment plant. Phase 1 is now 75% completed, with the bulk of the remaining works revolving around connecting the central networks to the residential and commercial units.
-  The contract value for the second phase alone would surpass our annual new order assumption of RM600mil for the next two years. Additionally, the rapid development in Sarawak also necessitates the implementation of central sewerage systems as well as flood mitigation programmes in other cities and towns. Apart from numerous water supplyrelated jobs in the state that are in urgent need of implementation, other potential major jobs include:-
-  1) The Balingian power plant: HSL’s is one of two consortia still in the running. It has been reported that the plant could cost RM2.5bil. HSL could benefit from RM300mil-RM400mil worth of ancillary jobs. We understand from Sarawak Energy Bhd that the project could be awarded by year-end or early next year, pending finalisation of the coal supply contract.
-  2) The RM300mil-RM400mil proposed Mukah (a SCORE growth node) new airport: The tender for the RM150mil phase one (earthworks and land reclamation) has closed. Phases two and three involve the construction of the runway and terminal building.
-  3) The development of the halal hub in Tanjung Manis: We understand the state’s Regional Economic Corridor Development Authority (Recoda) is in the final stages of finalising the masterplan for Tanjung Manis, another SCORE growth node. HSL is the pioneer developer of the infrastructure there.
-  We continue to like HSL for its:- a) strong earnings visibility; b) strong balance sheet, including RM200mil cash and cash equivalents, and being debt-free; and c) as a proxy to the state’s development agenda.
Source: AmeSecurities

Monday, November 18, 2013

IJM Corp - Kuantan Port to Get Bigger

Highlights

We returned, on a POSITIVE note, from our recent visit to Kuantan Port and the surrounding Gebeng Industrial Estate. Below are the visit highlights:
Background… Kuantan Port which spans over 650ha has 22 berths with a total berth length of ~4km and maximum depth of ~11m. It can cater for a maximum vessel capacity of 53k ton (see Figure #1). The robust activities in the port are supported by various industries, mainly in Gebeng, ranging from palm oil to petrochemical products.
Iron growth… The port is fully utilised with a cargo throughput of 17m fwt and its growth has been mainly supported by the export of iron ore. As of FYE Mar-13, iron ore exports made up 1/3 of its revenue. In terms of earnings contribution, the port posted PAT of RM79.8m, which makes up ~20% of IJM’s FY13 core earnings.
Roping in China… As part of the G2G negotiations to attract investments from China into the East Coast Economic Region, IJM will dispose its 40% stake in Kuantan Port to Guangxi Beibu Gulf International Port Group Co Ltd for RM334.4m (kindly refer to our report “Kuantan expansion becomes a reality” dated 10 Sep-13). In return, the Chinese party will bring in investors to setup industrial plants in the new Malaysia-China Kuantan Industrial Park (MCKIP). The port’s concession which will end in 2027 will also be extended by another 60 years to at least 2072.
Expansion plans… To cater for the imminent demand from MCKIP, Kuantan Port will build a new deep water terminal with 2km berthing space and depth of 18m. The port expansion will be developed over 2 phases, with phase one the first km of new berthing space. The Government is currently constructing a 4.6km new breakwater, and Phase 1’s construction cost of RM1bn is expected to benefit IJM’s construction division. A timely boost to replenish its current order book of RM1.9bn (1.2x FY13 construction revenue).
Transhipment goal… With the expanded capacity, Kuantan Port seeks to increase its transhipment business especially for cargoes towards the North East Asia route, particularly China.

Risks

Execution risk; Regulatory and political risk (both domestic and overseas); Rising raw material prices; Unexpected downturn in the construction, property and plantation cycle; and Sharp fluctuation in forex.

Forecasts

Unchanged.

Rating

BUY
Positives: (1) Higher upwards price sensitivity towards new contract wins; (2) Strategic shareholding in WCE and Kuantan Port to clinch projects; (3) Recovery in construction margin; (4) Robust contribution from IJM Land; (5) FFB growth to mitigate weak CPO prices.
Negatives: (1) Delays in securing sizable contracts; (2) Continued deterioration in CPO prices; (3) Slower than expected take-up rates for its property launches.

Valuation

TP maintained at RM6.32 based on SOP valuation.
Source: Hong Leong Investment Bank Research - 18 Nov 2013

布米亚马大 盈利预估获上修

(吉隆坡18日讯)布米亚马大(ARMADA,5210,主要板贸易)获合约首次将浮式生产储卸油船(FPSO)业务,扩展至北大西洋的一部分的北海(North Sea),获券商上修盈利预估与目标价,利好激励股价节节走高。
委任新财务长
 该股今早起11仙,以3.90令吉报开,获英国上市公司EnQuest合约,为其北海油田供应浮式生产储卸油船利好发酵,早盘最高升至3.94令吉,劲起15仙。
 休市时,布米亚马大仍挂在3.94令吉,易手37万5600股,午盘间一度涨17仙,写下全日最高3.96令吉,闭市挂在3.94令吉,成交量116万8800股。
黄氏星展唯高达报告指出,该公司预计将在本月30日前签署这项合约,目前尚未透露合约值,不过基于该油田生产力估计可持续25年,这项合约为期8年,另有17年延长期。
 “8年合约估计合约值将逾50亿令吉,基于布米亚马大业务稳定,上调2014与2015财年盈利预估24%与34%,目标价由3.30令吉调高至4.50令吉。”
 另厢,布米亚马大旗下总财务长沙哈鲁获升为岸外支援船只(OSV)主管,新职务任期今日生效,并委任肯尼麦多兹担任总财务长一职。肯尼麦多兹此前在丹麦Maersk石油担任总财务长。

Friday, November 15, 2013

买进劵商心头好.续扩大槟城市占率 恒大置地可趁低吸纳

券商:兴业证券研究 ◆目标价:2.05令吉
恒大置地(TAMBUN,5191,主要板房产)以1470万令吉在槟城Pearl City收购24.1英亩土地,不仅维持33%至37%高赚幅,并推高发展总值至28亿令吉。
 该集团将通过内部融资和贷款集资,料在2014年首季完成收购上述土地。
 Pearl City额外贡献发展总值达1亿2000万至1亿3000万令吉,并将总发展价值推高至28亿令吉。
 我们看好恒大置地管理层持续扩大槟城市占率,该集团每平方尺14令吉收购成本,低于现有在Pearl City每平方18令吉平均账面成本。该片土地售价亦低于市价,因出口只能通往恒大置地土地。
 恒大置地旗下计划的海外买家仅占1%至2%,再加上Pearl City多数单位买家以自住为主,因此预算案提出的房产市场冷却措施对该集团影响甚微。
 同时,槟城成长前景依旧强劲。槟城第2大桥将在2014年初启用,本地和海外投资流入提升就业机会,当地政府在峇都交湾推行计划和大型业者增加地库活动,将是恒大置地的催化剂。
 我们维持恒大置地“买进”评级,目标价上调至2.05令吉,近期股价调整更是累计优质房产股好时机。
 本月16日(周五)闭市时,恒大置地报1.44令吉,起3仙,成交量为35万2500股。

Thursday, November 14, 2013

斤经济较:必须懂的财报比率(下) - 夜月

还债率(Solvency Ratio)
还债率主要用来测量公司还清利息和长期债务的可达性。要是公司无法还债,可能就要面临变卖资产或者倒闭,所以这个是一个重要的事情。
 
1 负债资产比(Debt to Assets Ratio)
Debt to Assets Ratio=Total Debt/Total Assets
负债资产比是用来测量有多少资产是靠负债来买的。普遍来说,负债资产比越低,代表着公司的财政风险较低,还债能力越强,以后借钱也比较容易。
 
2 Interest Coverage
Interest Coverage=Earning before Interest & Tax(EBIT)/Interest Payment
Interest Coverage是用来测量公司偿还债务利息的能力。Interest Coverage 越高,偿还利息能力越强。
 
盈利率(Profitability Ratio)
盈利率是我觉得其中一个非常重要的指标。一家公司最主要的任务就是获利。一家无法获利的公司肯定不是一家好公司。
 
1 净利率(Net Profit Margin)
Net Profit Margin=Net Profit/Revenue
净利率主要用来衡量公司的节俭程度和效率。净利率越高代表公司可以以最少的成本销售出货品,证明这家公司的竞争力强。要达到高净利率,除了要减少浪费之 外,就是注重科技,以最新科技的机器来减少成本。在算净利率时有一点要注意的是,那一年有没有额外的一次性收入,因为会造成误差。
 
2 股东回报率 (Return of Equity)
Return of Equity=Net Income/Equity
股东回报率可以显示出公司如何有效地利用资金,去赚取利润。股东回报率是少数的指标可以跨行业的比较。因为不管什么行业,只要股东回报率高的就是好公司。其他指标如净利率会被行业的因素影响。 
 
价值率 (Valuation Ratio)
价值率是用来衡量公司的价值和价格的差值,简单来讲就是显示公司的股价是高还是低。
 
1 本益比 (PE Ratio)
PE Ratio=Price per Share/Earning per Share
本益比是我本人非常喜欢用来选股的指标之一。本益比用公司的盈利能力来衡量公司的价格。比如:一家公司的本益比=5,代表你投资在该公司的钱需要5年 就可以回本。但是有一个重要的条件就是,每年的盈利都一样。由于这个条件,盈利比较稳定或者成长性高的公司本益比会比较高。就好像消费品公司营业额稳定, 科技公司成长性高,所以这两种行业公司的本益比会比其他行业高,建筑业公司因为是接工程的,所以盈利不稳定,本益比普遍较低。
 
2 PB Ratio
PB Ratio=Price per Share/Net Assets per Share
PB Ratio是用公司的净资产来衡量公司的价格。PB Ratio是最保守的指标,因为它代表着当公司倒闭了,通过拍卖资产可以赔到多少钱。一般上用以拥有高价值资产的公司比如地产公司拥有地皮,金融公司拥有债券和股票等等。此外,PB Ratio并没有将无形的资产比如:公司的商誉和品牌价值计算在内,所以公司真正的价值可能会高出净资产很多。