The property cooling measures announced in Budget 2014 will be
adequate to curb speculation and ensure healthy growth of the property
industry. Although sector valuations have factored in the policy risk
to some extent, we see downside potential for the valuations
of some stocks, particularly those that are highly exposed to the
Iskandar region and have high foreign proportion of buyers. Maintain
NEUTRAL.
- Needs time to heal. In the face of the new property cooling measures, we expect the current consolidation in property demand and prices to continue. Based on past experience, the market is likely to need 3-6 months to adjust to the regulation changes.
- Iskandar the worst hit. Developers which have high exposure to the Iskandar region will be the most adversely affected. The 30% Real Property Gains Tax (RPGT) imposed on foreigners for disposals within the first five years will discourage short-term foreign speculators from buying properties. The holding period of a minimum of five years is the key deterrent. According to CBRE, foreign purchasers account for 54% of high-rise residential sales in Nusajaya and 39% in JB city a s well as the major suburbs. Although the demand for certain attractive projects will remain, we expect a knee-jerk slowdown in overall sales in Iskandar in the near term as the market is now less attractive than in the past.
- Penang mainland still healthy. The Penang mainland, on the other hand, will still see healthy growth as local property demand is largely driven by genuine buyers for occupancy purposes. Job opportunities created by both foreign and local MNCs and the opening of the Penang Second Bridge remain the key catalysts for demand growth.
- Developers relying on local buyers will fare better. Local buyers are still the main stream of sustainable buyers. The silver lining will be developers which concentrate on affordable housing and township developments. High-rise and luxury segments, in particular, will likely see a temporary slowdown in demand.
- Maintain NEUTRAL. Stick with IJM Land and Tambun Indah. We see no relief for the sector as the new measures will have an overall negative impact on developers. Maintain NEUTRAL on the sector. We continue to like IJMLD and Tambun Indah given the companies’ solid fundamentals and minimal exposure to foreign buyers.
Targeting Speculators
Key measures tabled in Budget 2014:
- The Real Property Gains Tax (RPGT) on properties disposed within the holding period of up to three years is raised to 30%, whereas for disposal within the holding period up to four and five years, the rates are increased to 20% and 15%, respectively. For disposals made in the sixth and subsequent years, no RPGT is imposed on citizens, whereas companies are taxed at 5%.
- For non-citizens, a 30% RPGT is imposed on the gains from properties disposed within the holding period of up to five years, and for disposals in the sixth and subsequent years, a 5% RPGT is imposed. The new tax regime (1 & 2) will be effective from 1 Jan 2014.
- Raising the floor price of properties for foreign buyers to MYR1m from MYR500k.
- Removal of Developer Interest Bearing Scheme (DIBS). Financial institutions are prohibited from providing final funding for proje cts involved in the DIBS scheme.
- To increase transparency in property sales prices, whereby detailed sales prices including all benefits and incentives will have to be displayed.
- Introduction of Private Affordable Ownership Housing Scheme (MyHome) to encourage private sector to build more low- and medium-cost houses. The scheme provides a subsidy of MYR30k to the private developers for each unit built. Among the criteria for the scheme are:
- Build at least 20% low-cost houses and 20% medium-cost houses in a housing project
- The maximum price of low-cost houses is MYR45k and medium-cost houses is MYR170k
- First-time buyers with a monthly household income of MYR3k are eligible for low-cost houses, whereas those with a maximum monthly household income of MYR6k are eligible for medium-cost houses.
Still bearable for locals. While some measures were within our
expectations, such as an increase in RPGT for the locals,
higher floor price for foreigners and the removal of the DIBS,
one new measure was rather unexpected – the significant
RPGT imposed on foreign buyers. Compared to previous budgets, Budget 2014 has the most punitive combination of measures for the property sector as the Government strives to keep speculation in check, targeting both local and foreign buyers alike. This is also part of the Government’s efforts to contain the rising household leverage in Malaysia. Such measures will help ensure the long-term healthy growth of the property industry.
RPGT imposed on foreign buyers. Compared to previous budgets, Budget 2014 has the most punitive combination of measures for the property sector as the Government strives to keep speculation in check, targeting both local and foreign buyers alike. This is also part of the Government’s efforts to contain the rising household leverage in Malaysia. Such measures will help ensure the long-term healthy growth of the property industry.
The 30% tax rate on local property owners has been extended for another year, ie disposal within three years vs. two years previously (from 2004 to 2007). Among all the measures, we believe the impact of a higher RPGT on local property owners is
relatively mild. This is because most of the new properties will take 2-3 years to be completed, and hence sellers will be subject to a lower gain tax bracket in year 4, which is at 20% under the new regime (vs. 30% in year 1-3), double the previous 10% tax rate under the old regime. Historically, when RPGT was imposed, the house price index (HPI) typically declined for 2-3 quarters before a rebound was seen. We expect the same trend to take place this time round.
Iskandar the hardest hit
The 30% RPGT for foreigners for disposals within the first five years will wipe out short-term foreign speculators to a certain extent, as the holding period of a minimum of five years will drive them away, in our view. The higher floor price is another deterrent for foreign buyers in Iskandar, particularly for investment/speculative purposes. Developers with high exposure to the Iskandar region will be the most adversely affected as the area has gained significant traction among foreigners over the past 1-2 years, especially among Singaporeans due to the strong SGD. According to CBRE, foreign purchasers accounted for 54% of total high-rise residential sales (sales by developers) in Nusajaya, and 39% in JB city and major suburbs. Property prices have also risen sharply, with the pricing of some new launches already matching those of KL city centre condominiums. Medini, in particular, which has no Bumioutra quota (although no minimum price restriction for
foreigners), will likely see a knee-jerk slowdown in property sales over the near term, as the market is now less lucrative compared to before. While there is still demand for some attractive projects, compared to a simple buying decision previously, potential foreign buyers will now have to think twice before purchasing properties in Malaysia. Based on official data, Johor residential and commercial property transactions historically made up 10-12% of the total transaction volume in Malaysia.
Although the percentage is higher for Selangor (ie 25-28%), the transaction volume in the Klang Valley is largely made up of Malaysian buyers . Therefore, we are not too concerned on developers that concentrate in KL and Selangor.
As a result of the RPGT hike, and hence potentially higher land holding costs, land transactions in Iskandar, especially from overseas developers, may slow down as property sales will likely languish over the next six months. Given such a situation, we
are now uncertain if the Johor state government will still go ahead with the proposedm 4-5% processing fee that will be imposed on foreigners, as the impact of the 30% RPGT is already detrimental.
Developers which have exposure to Iskandar include UEM Sunrise, Sunway, SP Setia, Mah Sing, KSL, and to some extent, IJM Land and E&O.
Penang mainland still healthy
Penang island will see some impact, although this will likely be less significant compared to Iskandar. The number of foreign buyers in Penang island is not large in our view, and they are mainly concentrated in Seri Tanjung Pinang and Batu
Ferringhi. In addition, the impact of the higher floor price on foreigners is negligible in Penang island, as the Penang state government had earlier raised the floor price to MYR1m for high-rise and MYR2m for landed properties.
Penang island will see some impact, although this will likely be less significant compared to Iskandar. The number of foreign buyers in Penang island is not large in our view, and they are mainly concentrated in Seri Tanjung Pinang and Batu
Ferringhi. In addition, the impact of the higher floor price on foreigners is negligible in Penang island, as the Penang state government had earlier raised the floor price to MYR1m for high-rise and MYR2m for landed properties.
Penang mainland, on the other hand, will still see healthy growth, as local property demand is largely driven by genuine buyers for owner occupancy. Property prices are still relatively decent. Employment opportunities created by both foreign and local
MNCs at Batu Kawan and Seberang Prai are key to support business activities and population expansion. The opening of the Penang Second Bridge in early 2014 will still be a major catalyst for mainland properties. Just recently, an Italy-based car
component maker Magneti Marelli has launched a new plant in Batu Kawan, which will create a workforce of 1,000 people. Besides this, Ibiden, Boon Siew Honda, VAT, Malaysia Automotive Lighting, Haemonetics Corporation are among the local/foreign
players which have committed their investments, and some have started running their new operations. Note also that, the global furniture maker IKEA has been looking to open an outlet on the mainland. Positive news flow will likely continue.
No more DIBS
This measure was expected. We believe most developers are well prepared for the removal of DIBS and will most likely launch some new schemes or incentives to circumvent this. On the ground, we understand that some developers have already
introduced new incentives for buyers with the introduction of “DISS” (Developer Interest Subsidy Scheme), whereby developers will reimburse the buyers an equivalent amount every month after buyers repay their installments to the banks.
To recap, the DIBS has been widely used by developers since the
subprime crisis in 2009 to revive demand for properties. Lower upfront
entry cost is offered to buyers with only a 5% downpayment and 95%
margin financing. Interest is absorbed by the
developers, and buyers do not have to pay loan installments during the period that the property is under construction. Not many developers under our coverage have excessive exposure to this scheme currently, as they have gradually withdrawn the scheme from some better selling projects over the last 1-2 years. Currently, most developers only offer DIBS for the slow-moving projects, mainly concentrating on the high-rise residential segment. Property price growth in the primary ma rket could see a temporary slowdown as developers can no longer mark up their selling prices too aggressively.
developers, and buyers do not have to pay loan installments during the period that the property is under construction. Not many developers under our coverage have excessive exposure to this scheme currently, as they have gradually withdrawn the scheme from some better selling projects over the last 1-2 years. Currently, most developers only offer DIBS for the slow-moving projects, mainly concentrating on the high-rise residential segment. Property price growth in the primary ma rket could see a temporary slowdown as developers can no longer mark up their selling prices too aggressively.
Although impact from this measure alone would be minimal, we believe the cumulative impact from all the measures imposed will have an overall negative impact on the sector. Among the companies under our coverage, we see IJM Land
and Tambun Indah having the least risk exposure. Sunway, UOAD, UEM Sunrise, Mah Sing and E&O, on the other hand, have higher percentage of projects that come with the DIBS.
Impact of GST
In normal circumstances, the net impact of GST will drive up property prices. While some believe that it would lead to buyers flocking to purchase properties in the near term (from now to March 2015 until the GST starts), we believe the demand will ultimately depend on affordability. Given all the measures tabled in Budget 2014, we expect property prices to continue its current consolidation trend.
In normal circumstances, the net impact of GST will drive up property prices. While some believe that it would lead to buyers flocking to purchase properties in the near term (from now to March 2015 until the GST starts), we believe the demand will ultimately depend on affordability. Given all the measures tabled in Budget 2014, we expect property prices to continue its current consolidation trend.
Maintain NEUTRAL
Investor sentiment will be hit. The cumulative impact will be painful for property developers in the near term, and it will likely take about 3-6 months for the market to adjust itself. Although the sector valuations have factored in the policy risk to some extent, we believe there is still downside to valuations for some stocks, particularly those that are highly exposed to the Iskandar region and have high foreig n property buying content. All these measures are expected to create some uncertainties for most developers in launching their projects already in the pipeline. Developers that rely more on local buyers will fare better. The silver lining will be developers which concentrate on affordable housing segment, such as Tambun Indah, Matrix Concepts and Hua Yang. In maintaining our 4Q13 view, we keep our NEUTRAL stance on the sector. We are selective in our stock picks. We continue to like IJM Land and Tambun Indah given their solid fundamentals and minimal exposure to foreign purchasers. Note that, IJM Land’s The Light Phase 1 is only left with the final Collection IV series and hence will not be an issue for the company. Although we retain our NEUTRAL rating on UEM Sunrise, E&O is kept at Trading BUY, largely because of the catalyst of upcoming approval for its Seri Tanjung Pinang 2 project, and we reiterate our view that, the stock is an attractive takeover target.
Source: RHB
No comments:
Post a Comment